2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying exams

Presented at Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 1: Recruitment and Support in Engineering Graduate Programs

In this paper, we present a student-developed and led program implemented in a graduate department to help students begin preparation for oral examinations on more equal footing. Despite the common use of oral qualifying (preliminary) examinations to assess students' ability to succeed and continue in an Engineering Ph.D. program, the communication skills needed to be successful in such a setting are not always explicitly taught in courses students take to prepare. We give a brief overview of historical and current qualifying exam practices, discuss the benefits and potential inequities of oral qualifying exams specifically, and finally, present one resource educators may use to address the gap in students' preparedness for this particular exam format.

During this department’s oral qualifying exams, students entering their second year solve technical problems on the blackboard while professors engage and evaluate not only their final answer but also their approach and problem-solving process. While in theory evaluating a student’s process rather than only the final answer can be more equitable, the oral exam format itself may actually amplify inequality via implied expectations that go beyond demonstrating mastery of technical concepts (the nominal goal). To succeed in an oral examination, students must also exhibit confident communication and skill working at the board, which serve as the main method of preparation for the exams, but these skills are not currently taught, practiced, or assessed during first-year courses.

We created a qualifying exam preparatory program to bridge the gap between the technical knowledge developed during the first year and the critical communication skills required to effectively demonstrate knowledge in an oral exam format. Our program, led by graduate student facilitators, consisted of voluntary hour-long weekly sessions with components targeting board work preparation, mental well-being, and study skills. We present details on our pedagogical framework, practical implementation, and lessons learned that highlight the program’s main benefits and areas for improvement. This case study is designed to offer one possible method to improve student success, well-being, and overall equity throughout the qualifying exam preparation process.

*Jacqueline Tawney and Meredith Hooper contributed equally to this work.

Authors
  1. Meredith Leigh Hooper California Institute of Technology [biography]
  2. Jacqueline Rose Tawney California Institute of Technology [biography]
  3. Dr. Emily Hope Palmer California Institute of Technology [biography]
  4. James Ragan California Institute of Technology [biography]
  5. Dr. Morgan Louise Hooper California Institute of Technology [biography]
  6. Yazmin Gonzalez California Institute of Technology [biography]
Download paper (1.42 MB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.

» Download paper

« View session

For those interested in:

  • Graduate
  • Advocacy and Policy
  • engineering