2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Diversity and Equity as Part of Personal Decision-Making

Presented at Engineering Economy Division (EED) Technical Session

Diversity, equity, and inclusion can be difficult to incorporate into an engineering economy course. However, there are products and services where diversity and demographics are directly linked with personal finance and economic equity. Engineering economy courses can cover useful qualitative perspectives for life, vehicle, and medical insurance. Engineering economy tools are required for investing for retirement and retirement planning.

Mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) show large differences in the “expectation of life at age x.” The tabulated value at birth for a male American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) is 63.8 years and for a female Asian it is 22.1 years longer at 85.9 years. At age 22 the gap between the same two groups is still 21.1 years. By age 67 (full retirement age for Social Security) the gap is 8.2 years, but the comparison is between the female Asian and Black male groups. These differences are substantial, of major social importance, and highly relevant for personal financial planning by students—now and as retirement nears.

The most recent NVSS data is available in 10 sub-categories—2 genders × 5 ethnic groups with aggregated totals. While ethnic group data cannot be used in setting rates or benefits, it is relevant to personal decision-making. Gender is legally considered for many types of insurance, annuities, and social security benefit determinations. Thus, averages for both genders and for the total population underlie discussions of how much should be saved, what costs will be, and when social security benefits should be started.

We assert that engineering economy courses should include the use of relevant demographic based information for personal financial decision making. Students will begin making financial decisions regarding insurance, investing, and retirement planning soon after entering the workplace, if they haven’t already. People need to understand how they compare to the “average” that is used to determine costs and benefits.

How long you expect to live is clearly part of planning how much to save for retirement and even when a person plans to retire. An average age at death for a student’s gender and ethnicity is only a rough estimate of a very uncertain event hopefully many decades away—but it is a starting point for planning. If a student plans for a 20-year retirement, then the investing period is average age at death minus a 20-year retirement minus their current age. If a person plans to retire at 67, then the average age at death determines the horizon for drawing down the investment.

For introductory courses the mortality distribution should be simplified to an average age at death (used in this paper). For more advanced courses the mortality distributions can be used to calculate expected values and standard deviations for retirement benefits (references provided). At either level demographic differences can be discussed as a proxy for differences due to a student’s heredity, health, or lifestyle.

Authors
  1. Dr. Neal A. Lewis University of Nebraska - Lincoln [biography]
Download paper (734 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.