This paper is a work in progress. Complex problem-solving has been considered as one of the core competencies in current engineering education. Research has presented different perspectives to realize the evaluation of complex problem-solving competency, for instance the decomposing skills and learning goals; the scientific scope of the problem and the size of the project; the decision-making process of domain professionals; and the psychometric viewpoint. In general, there has been multiple methods based on different conceptual frameworks and informative inputs from professional engineers; but there is a lack of investigation on how engineering teachers understand and practice this concept in classroom. The importance of complex problem-solving has not been widely recognised in engineering education practitioners. In this paper, we briefly review current research; and introduce a bottom-up exploration based on engineering teachers. Using semi-structured interviews, we focus specifically on the learning procedures and goals related to the solving of complex engineering problems in teachers’ mind, and then present a conceptual framework. We pay close attention to the cognitive consensus and divergence between practicing teachers and current research. The implications on engineering teaching, educational reform, and future research are discussed.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.