This Evidence-Based Practice paper presents the results of an innovation mindset training effort as part of a National Science Foundation funded RED (Revolutionizing Engineering Departments) Adaptation and Implementation (A&I) grant focused on changing the culture of a large traditional mechanical engineering department at Texas A&M University (TAMU). The goal of this project is to shift the departmental culture from one that generally devalues teaching and relies on sporadic, undocumented individual intuitive innovations to one that values and focuses on identified student outcomes achieved through a sustained process of incremental experimentation, measurement, and sharing. Based on the substantial literature on institutional change, we investigated the effectiveness of a different strategy based on assisting faculty with curricular or pedagogical changes through an innovation training workshop series and the creation of a learning, sharing community of practice so that they can self-regulate their teaching innovations. We introduced a workshop on educational innovation, to improve faculty approaches to curricular or pedagogical changes. This included the initiation of educational innovation teams and the framework to encourage innovation. Faculty were asked to create groups and propose changes to their curriculum or pedagogy before the innovation training workshop. They were asked to resubmit their proposed changes after the workshop. We evaluated the changes in their approach by scoring their proposals based on a rubric that was created for assessing the evolution of faculty's mindset and behavioral changes. The results were used to inform what changes were needed to the innovation training. In this paper, we report on the results of two rounds of innovation training (with approximately 11 faculty in 4 teams in the first round and 15 faculty in 5 teams in the second round) that were performed in the summer of 2020 and 2021 and the resulting changes in the workshop structure. From the assessment scores, it is found that faculty consciously follow the innovator mindset methodology to formulate their teaching plans and each team has a common sense of iterative teaching innovation. However more work is needed in other aspects including the ability to develop measurable formative “lead indicators” of the teams' progress (as opposed to a final evaluation of whether they achieved their goals) and also on the faculty's ability to explicitly consider how inclusive their pedagogical changes were.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.