In recent years, educational institutions have experienced unprecedented challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, including changes in course delivery and the pandemic’s impact on the preparedness and mental health of incoming students. The consequences of the pandemic were further exacerbated for at-risk populations, including first-generation college students, underrepresented minority (URM) students, and women as the gender minority.
Our team has previously reported on the impact of pre-matriculation credits, supplemental instruction (SI), and the transition to college on academic success in a first-year chemistry course for engineering students, with a focus on gendered differences. In this present study, we have expanded our scope to understand more broadly how, for students starting their engineering studies in 2021, their core identity (gender and race/ethnicity), background (first-generation status and pre-matriculation credits), preconceptions and attitudes, and use of SI correlate with their first-semester grades and their outlook towards their overall studies. To address this goal, we administered surveys at the start and end of the Fall 2021 semester to first-year engineering students at Northeastern University and received a response rate of 65% (485 students, consisting of 191 female-identifying, 292 male-identifying, and 2 non-binary students). Survey responses were paired with corresponding institutional data for grades and SI use.
We found that women had higher grade-thresholds for seeking SI and reported more factors negatively impacting their learning at the start and end of the semester, as well as more pessimistic outlooks towards their general studies compared to men. These differences were observed despite the fact that both genders entered their first-year with a similar number of pre-matriculation credits and received comparable grades. We also found that the overall number of pre-matriculation credits did not impact the number of learning concerns students reported. First-generation and URM students enrolled with fewer pre-matriculation credits, reported a greater number of learning concerns, and received lower first-semester grades than their peers. For female first-generation college students and female URM students, the intersectionality of underrepresented identities resulted in greater adverse outcomes, including more negative outlooks and lower grades, which may have long-term consequences for their retention.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.