In summer 2021, the Florida Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (FL-AGEP) convened research bootcamps for doctoral scholars, postdoctoral scholars, and early career faculty women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The FL-AGEP Alliance addresses the issues of (1) advancing underrepresented women (URW) faculty in STEM, and (2) the retention of URW post-docs and graduate scholars for careers in academia. Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) with the University of South Florida (USF) and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Florida International University (FIU), Florida Memorial University (FMU), and Bethune Cookman University (B-CU) are the FL-AGEP Alliance institutions. As a result of the convening various misogynoir were expressed. Our team began to explore the research of the intersectionalities, success and professional identity of women of color to understand the needed paradigm shift to occur within the Academy.
It has been noted that Women in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields accounted for 3.6%, 2.5%, and 1.2% of all assistant, associate, and full professors. Cultural and institutional barriers to the STEM disciplines continue for women in higher education. There is a paucity of resources, retention, promotion, and success for women scholars from marginalized groups, this study explores the professional identity formation, the role of entrepreneurial mindset, and coping strategies supporting the success of women in higher education STEM disciplines.
Purpose: Our presentation aims to (a) present a counter narrative to how “success” is defined by women of color faculty in STEM, (b) explore the role of professional identity and how it interpolates with social identities to shape their experience of success, and (c) catalog the sources of stress and support affecting success among women of color faculty in STEM disciplines.
Design/Method: Using a descriptive phenomenological approach, we conducted focus groups with women of color faculty in STEM disciplines across the US. Data was analyzed using CAQDAS code list to formalize the standard qualitative content analysis by a team of women of color higher faculty and staff in STEM disciplines. Data will be analyzed using both deductive and inductive analytic approaches.
Results: The result of the focus groups is that the Women faculty expressed various areas for marked improvement in how success is viewed as it relates to promotion. The preliminary findings speak to the research that would need to continue within the interviews.
Conclusions: This study contributes to the scant literature on the resources, retention, promotion, and success for women scholars from marginalized groups. We provide a counter narrative to previously established concepts of success by allowing the actors to define success in their own terms. Our findings can support practical approaches to women of color faculty retention, promotion, and overall success.
Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.